The Election Interference Is Coming From Inside The House

In 2016, the DNC used Russia to deflect from Wikileaks revelations. It worked so well, they used the Russiaphobic ruse to explain away their devastating loss to their own Pied Piper. Since, "Election Meddling" has been used as pretext to alter the way we communicate on social media, and to justify silencing all of the DNC's most outspoken critics.

The 2016 election was supposed to be "the least contentious election of our time," but a comedy of errors from a bungling DNC ended up handing the reins of the free world to Donald Trump on a gold-plated platter. Any other time in modern American history, that would've been the end of Hillary Clinton's campaign of inevitability. The cabal would be disbanded and the figureheads & sycophants who schemed to chart a cheating course to victory would all retreat from the public square in shame, at least for awhile. Especially after a campaign as haphazard and disgraced as Hillary's, her crushing defeat at the hands of her own Pied Piper should've silenced her and her surrogates forever. But that didn't happen.

Instead, a sham primary election and a surefire Pied Piper Strategy backfired, with Wikileaks publications revealing the Clinton Machine scheme in elaborate detail, from secret agreements with the Sanders campaign and plotting to elevate Trump to laying groundwork to make Trump look "weak on Russia/cozy with Putin" all the way back in April of 2016. As Hillary's DNCC gala became more about damage control and less about celebrating breaking through that glass ceiling, we began to witness the inception of a new plot that is just reaching its climax now, with weeks to go til the 2020 election: a plan to ensure that what happened in 2016 may never be allowed to happen again, without any of that pesky taking responsibility and retreating in shame. In order to justify a complicit MSM refusing to cover Wikileaks revelations and to avoid ever having to address any of the shocking secrets that Julian Assange exposed, the DNC would simply blame Russia. Any other time in American history, this would've been lambasted as the unscrupulous political sleight of hand it was, and the people responsible for hatching the plan would've been laughed of the public stage. But that didn't happen.

In May of 2016, it was already common knowledge that Hillary's emails had been intercepted, after a Romanian hacker Marcel Lehel Lazar, known as "Guccifer," was arrested. At the time the Clinton campaign said it was "unfathomable" that she had been hacked. "There is absolutely no basis to believe the claims made by this criminal from his prison cell. It is unfathomable that he would have gained access to her emails and not leaked them," they said, while insisting that there was no government intelligence that suggested her emails had been hacked, and that her own server logs proved there had been no breach of her illegal private email server.

Just two months later, on Friday, the 22 of July of 2016 at 10:30am EDT, #WikiLeaks released 19,252 emails and 8,034 attachments - part one of Assange's "Hillary Leaks" series. Two days after that first batch of bombshells, on July 24th, 2016, Robby Mook went on CNN and planted the "Russia did it" hoax, saying "experts are telling us that Russian state actors broke in to the DNC, stole these emails, and other experts are now saying that the Russians are releasing these emails with the purpose of helping Donald Trump."

Really, Mr. Mook? The source of the allegations that would alter the political landscape in the US forever and potentially herald the very end of democracy as we knew it was "some experts" and "some other experts"? Was it the experts - or the other experts - that suggested pinning all of your own failings on Russia would be the best way to wriggle away from responsibility for your own incredibly stupid blunders? What could possibly go wrong.

Whether it was "the experts" or the "other experts" who came up with the brilliant idea of deflecting from "her damn emails" by reigniting The Cold War, the media took the bait and immediately started parroting the "Russia did it" angle, never substantively covering the content of the leaks. Chris Cuomo went on CNN and told the American public that it was illegal to even look at Wikileaks emails. Credible evidence suggestive of numerous and varied criminal offenses was shuffled into the memory hole with rumors of horrors found of Anthony Weiner's laptop, branded with the words "Russian" and "conspiracy theory" and "election interference," never to be spoken of again. This might have been the end of it, except for one little thing. A few months later, the unthinkable happened: Hillary Clinton lost to her own Pied Piper.

This is where the little lie begins to snowball. Unable to accept defeat and participate proudly in the great American tradition of a peaceful transition of power, standing there on election day with Trump's wiretaps in one hand and a disinformation dossier packed with lies about the President-elect in the other, Democrats panicked. And in their panic, they decided to double down on the "Russia did it" subterfuge, since they had it handy and it seemed to go so well the first time.

Not only would they blame their loss on Russian "Election Interference" based on some manufactured and completely baseless idea that somehow Julian Assange was doing Putin's bidding by releasing HillaryEmails, DNCEmails and PodestaEmails, not only would they cry "Election Meddling" based on a couple hundred thousand dollars worth of Russian political ads on Facebook, they would accuse the President-elect of being a Russian Manchurian Candidate and imply that Russia actually compromised the integrity of the voting apparatus in the United States. They would pivot so fluidly between these conflicting and disparate ideas, their complicit media parroting each allegation with such certainty, they actually turned their ruse into a federal inquisition, squandering years of the people's time and millions of taxpayer dollars investigating their own hollow allegations.

But while all this was going on, quietly in the background, the curators of the world were working overtime to create an infrastructure to hobble the American public's ability to find information and communicate in advance of this election.

June 2017, almost exactly one year after Wikileaks revealed the sham DNC primary while DNC was hosting their ceiling-shattering gala for Hillary, Google quietly stops allowing users to filter news topics by date, effectively crippling their own search engine to hinder our ability to piece together what happened after the fact. A year after that, in August of 2018, the tech giants take a page out of Steinbeck's "The Pearl" and collude to arrange the wholesale deplatforming of Alex Jones, banning him and his show from all major platforms at the same time - a frightening precedent. Over the next few years, we watch in horror as Big Tech gradually tightens its stranglehold on narrative. YouTube alters their algorithms to suppress all media except those channels approved by the curators of the world. Social media giants gradually roll out ever more stringent acceptable use policies, while wantonly purging users for political speech or suspected infractions, often without explanation. The chilling effects of these acts stifle the political discourse and promote an environment of fear, suspicion, and tattle-telling. This is objectively and self-evidently un-American already, and we haven't even gotten to 2020 yet.

This year, we've been set upon by the clown bug plague, and for some very strange reason, all the infrastructure that had been built up in order to manipulate the 2020 election was quickly repurposed to politicize the virus and suppress treatments and cures. Facing an abomination virus with no known treatments, doctors have been banned for discussing potential treatments. At a time when collaboration isn't just critical, it's literally a matter of life and death, those who we trust with our lives have been hindered by those we've trusted with our data. Like the colluding businessmen in The Pearl, the curators of the world have secretly gotten together and decided that they will rig the game in their favor, but instead of condemning one child to die for their greed, they have condemned millions of people the world over to suffer, and forbidden them from discussing any prospect of relief with their peers. This is a scandal unto itself and a crime against humanity, but it's another story for another time, and just a footnote in this particular tale, important because it highlights how sinister and rampant this censorship, suppression of speech, and perpetuation of propaganda has become. This draconian disinformation campaign is killing people right now, not just impacting the future of an election.

Impacting the future of an election, yesterday the NYPOST came out with a story that would end a campaign during any normal election year, documenting Biden’s pay-for-play corruption during his time as VP, something that Biden has long denied. In response, Twitter and Facebook both moved to censor the story, disallowing people from sharing the link publicly or privately. People who shared images from the article found their accounts suspended. Twitter even suspended the official account of the White House Press Secretary, temporarily disabled the @nypost twitter account and then suspended it, and even went to far as to block a .gov website url where the GOP had mirrored some of the contents of the article in response to the censorship. Incidentally, Twitter’s Head of Site Integrity” who helped develop Twitter’s fact-checking policies seems to be afflicted with TDS. This panicked knee-jerk reaction to credible evidence of Biden’s wrongdoing looks so bad, even @jack had to disown it, saying Twitter’s reaction to the story was “not great” – without apologizing to those impacted by the censorship or making any small effort to make amends. Facebook on the other hand has no regrets, as its Policy Communications Director, a former DNC staffer, insists they have “fact-checkers” evaluating the article and are just suppressing it til they are satisfied with the review process, something that should only take a few weeks to complete. Not as if anything of consequence might be happening in the span of a few weeks, right?

This morning the NYPOST published another article documenting more of Hunter Biden's exploits at the expense of our nation. The URL has not yet been identified and blacklisted by the curators of the world, but it is yet the wee hours of the morning, and I wouldn't expect to find it unencumbered by "this site may be harmful to the DNC's ambitions" warnings by midday. Right now a panicked DNC is realizing that the NYPOST article wasn't a one-off but a harbinger of more stunning revelations of Biden's corruption to come, and scrambling with the curators of the world to organize a coordinated response that may somehow justify continuing to censor the truth about Biden. As of about an hour ago as I'm writing this, the Trump campaign's official Twitter account, @TeamTrump, was suspended for saying "Joe Biden is a liar who has been ripping off our country for years" and linking to the NYPOST article. The account was suspended for "posting other people's information without their express permission," so I guess the fact that Joe Biden has been enriching his family at our expense for decades counts as Biden's "personal information." Weeks out from an election. In the United States of America.

(Update: It's now 8AM as I finish this article and the new NYPOST piece about Hunter Biden's dirty dealings with China has already been censored by the curators of the world.)

Meanwhile, Twitter is promoting a story about Biden turning a Blizzard upside-down at Dairy Queen at the top of #WhatsHappening curated "trends" right now, right above an article about how Biden is a "fundraising superstar," just above another headline about why Trump's upcoming Town Hall is so controversial, rotating out with another article WaPo rushed out yesterday to "fact-check" the situation, the headline asserting "Joe Biden did not pressure Ukraine to fire the prosecutor" that was investigating the company that was paying Hunter off to solicit influence from his father, even though there is video that everyone and their mother has seen by now of Biden bragging about doing just that. And now guess who they're trying to blame for exposing Biden's corruption? You guessed it! Russia. Because if Russia is said to have any part in exposing the Democrat party or any of their operatives, we're supposed to turn a blind eye and bury our heads in the sand and hum a happy tune til it goes away. "See something, say something," unless it negatively impacts our guy, in which case just say "Russia" and it magically goes away, just like the clown bug plague on November fourth.

It turns out the revolution will be televised, so long as it's a color revolution in service of our corporate overlords, but the willful violation of the spirit and letter of the law by our own elected representatives won't be, and it won't be seen on social media, unless the curators of the world want it to be. Just as the founders envisioned.

About the author

Chelsea Belle

"Cassandra," apparently. Truth & facts in the spirit of parody. My dot com was seized for discussing cures. Branded a "conspiracy mill" by NYT. Building one rn